|
Banner Here |
|
|
| Page 9 |
. | Land Use Plan In response to Commissioner Judah’s inquiry regarding restoration costs of agricultural land and storm water management, Mr. Reese stated that conversion costs are significant and that these costs are included in the Hanson report. Hanson Real Estate Advisors, Inc. Consultant Woodward S. Hanson clarified his report. Discussion ensued, between the Board and the County Attorneys, on the 810/910 rule and GPICPU; on how the county is subjected to legal liability; and on the processes involved if Bert Harris claims are filed. In response to Commissioner Albion’s inquiry regarding Community Development’s satisfaction with Option 1, Community Development Director Mary Gibbs suggested that the Board first decide in favor of Option 1, then enter discussions with the community to modify the plan amendment. Commissioner Albion spoke in favor of Mr. Hanson’s experience, skill and credibility; stated that neither immediate action nor a court decision would resolve the problems; and recommended the suggestion provided by Ms. Gibbs. The Board directed Ms. Gibbs to begin discussions with the Pine Island community to establish compromises, decide on a proper use of language, and provide monthly reports to the Board. Commissioner St. Cerny moved for Option No. 1, for the Board to take no action on the plan, continue to litigate and support the entire plan, while waiting to see if any Bert Harris claims ever arise; and reviewed that this followed suit with Administrative hearing on November 29, 2004, and gave Ms. Gibbs ample opportunity to help the people of Pine Island resolve the issues. Commissioner Albion suggested adding to the motion that an update be given to the Board at the November Management and Planning Meeting. Commissioner Judah seconded the motion, including the update. The motion was called and carried. |
|
. | Violation
to Pine Island Developer |
| Back |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|